Skip Navigation Links
Journal of Vibration Testing and System Dynamics

C. Steve Suh (editor), Pawel Olejnik (editor),

Xianguo Tuo (editor)

Pawel Olejnik (editor)

Lodz University of Technology, Poland

Email: pawel.olejnik@p.lodz.pl

C. Steve Suh (editor)

Texas A&M University, USA

Email: ssuh@tamu.edu

Xiangguo Tuo (editor)

Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, China

Email: tuoxianguo@suse.edu.cn


A Semi-analytical Study on Non-Linear Partial Differential Equations in Different Enzyme Kinetics with Amperometric Biosensors

Journal of Vibration Testing and System Dynamics 9(4) (2025) 333--345 | DOI:10.5890/JVTSD.2025.12.003

J. Anantha Jothi$^1$, V. Ananthaswamy$^2$

$^1$ Research Scholar, Research Centre and PG Department of Mathematics, The Madura College (Affiliated to Madurai Kamaraj University), Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India

$^2$ Research Centre and PG Department of Mathematics, The Madura College (Affiliated to Madurai Kamaraj University), Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India

Download Full Text PDF

 

Abstract

This current research work investigates the mathematical models of biosensors. The given models are constructed which depends on non-linear reaction equations pertaining with an enzyme process element. The approximate analytical results for time-dependent conditions of concentrations and current are provided in dimensional for all values of the parameters. The semi-analytical findings for the concentrations of substrate, co-substrate as well as the current are attained by utilising the new homotopy perturbation method (NHPM). On comparing the numerical simulation with our findings, a good fit is reached. The impacts of several parameters, including the substrate's reaction rate constant and co-substrate, diffusion coefficient for substrate and co-substrate, maximal velocity of enzyme reaction and thickness of the active membrane are graphically represented. The effect of numerous parameters on current namely maximal velocity of enzyme reaction, diffusion coefficient for co-substrate and substrate's reaction rate constant are displayed graphically.

References

  1. [1]  Turner, A.P.F., Karube, I., and Wilson, G.S. (1987), Biosensors: Fundamentals and Applications, UK: Oxford University Press.
  2. [2]  Ferreira, A.A.P., Uliana, C.V., de Souza Castilho, M., Pesquero, N.C., Foguel, M.V., dos Santos, G.P., and Yamanaka, H. (2013), Amperometric biosensor for diagnosis of disease, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 253-289.
  3. [3]  Yogeswaran, U. and Chen, S.M. (2008), A review on the electrochemical sensors and biosensors composed of nanowires as sensing material, Sensors, 8(1), 290-313. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8010290.
  4. [4]  Chen, C., Xie, Q., Yang, D., Xiao, H., Fu, Y., Tan, Y., and Yao, S. (2013), Recent advances in electrochemical glucose biosensors: a review, RSC Advances, 3(14), 4473-4491. DOI: 10.1039/C2RA22351A.
  5. [5]  Mell, L.D. and Maloy, J.T. (1975), Model for the amperometric enzyme electrode obtained through digital simulation and applied to the immobilized glucose oxidase system, Analytical Chemistry, 47(2), 299-307.
  6. [6]  Baronas, R., Kulys, J., Petrauskas, K., and Razumiene, J. (2012), Modelling carbon nanotubes-based mediatorless biosensor, Sensors, 12(7), 9146-9160.
  7. [7]  Lyons, M.E., Murphy, J., and Rebouillat, S. (2000), Theoretical analysis of time-dependent diffusion, reaction and electromigration in membranes, Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 4, 458-472. https://doi.org/ 1007/s100089900085.
  8. [8]  Senthamarai, R. and Ranjani, R.J. (2018), Solution of non-steady-state substrate concentration in the action of biosensor response at mixed enzyme kinetics, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1000(1), 012138, IOP Publishing.
  9. [9]  Neykov, A. and Rangelova, V. (1998), Mathematical modeling of the biosensor systems, Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment, 12(2), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.1998.10819000.
  10. [10]  Dzyadevych, S.V., Soldatkin, A.P., Korpan, Y.I., Arkhypova, V.N., El'skaya, A.V., Chovelon, J.M., and Jaffrezic-Renault, N. (2003), Biosensors based on enzyme field-effect transistors for determination of some substrates and inhibitors, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 377, 496-506. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-003-2134-4.
  11. [11]  Baronas, R., Ivanauskas, F., Kaunietis, I., and Laurinavicius, V. (2006), Mathematical modeling of plate--gap biosensors with an outer porous membrane, Sensors, 6(7), 727-745. https://doi.org/10.3390/s6070727.
  12. [12]  Hashem Zadeh, S.M., Heidarshenas, M., Ghalambaz, M., Noghrehabadi, A., and Saffari Pour, M. (2020), Numerical modeling and investigation of amperometric biosensors with perforated membranes, Sensors, 20(10), 2910.
  13. [13]  Baronas, R. and Kulys, J. (2008), Modelling amperometric biosensors based on chemically modified electrodes, Sensors, 8(8), 4800-4820. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8084800.
  14. [14]  Goyal, A., Bairagi, P.K., and Verma, N. (2020), Mathematical modelling of a non-enzymatic amperometric electrochemical biosensor for cholesterol, Electroanalysis, 32(6), 1251-1262. https://doi.org/10.1002/ elan.201900354.
  15. [15]  Vinayagan, J.A., Krishnan, S.M., Rajendran, L. and Eswari, A. (2024), Incorporating different enzyme kinetics in amperometric biosensor for the steady-state conditions: A complete theoretical and numerical approach, International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 100693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoes.2024.100693.
  16. [16]  Rangelova, V., Katsarova, P.. and Iliev, K.J. (2007), Influence of parameters over biosensors response in dynamic mode at different enzyme kinetic, Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara---Journal of Engineering, 5, 105-112.
  17. [17]  Baronas, R., Ivanauskas, F., and Kulys, J. (2021), Mathematical Modeling of Biosensors, Springer International Publishing.
  18. [18]  Wazwaz, A.M. (2014), The variational iteration method for solving linear and nonlinear ODEs and scientific models with variable coefficients, Central European Journal of Engineering, 4, 64-71. https://doi.org/ 10.2478/s13531-013-0141-6.
  19. [19]  Ananthaswamy, V. and Narmatha, S. (2020), Mathematical analysis of reversible inhibitor biosensor systems in dynamic mode, Singapore Journal of Scientific Research, 10(3), 229-265.
  20. [20]  Vijayalakshmi, V., Ananthaswamy, V., Anantha Jothi, J., and Sivasundaram, S. (2023), A mathematical study on non-linear steady state reaction-diffusion equations in transport and kinetics at carbon nanotube, Nonlinear Studies, 30(2), 613-639.
  21. [21]  Seethalakshmi, B., Ananthaswamy, V., Narmatha, S., and Felicia Shirly, P. (2022), Approximate analytical solution to a pore network model of deactivation of immobilized glucose isomerase in packed-bed reactors using Akbari-Ganji's method, Communications in Mathematics and Applications, 13(3), 865-875.
  22. [22]  Vijayalakshmi, V., Ananthaswamy, V., and Anantha Jothi, J. (2023), Semi-analytical study on non-isothermal steady RD equation in a spherical catalyst and biocatalyst, CFD Letters, 15(12), 60-76. https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.15.12.6076.
  23. [23]  He, J.H. (2000), A coupling method of a homotopy technique and a perturbation technique for non-linear problems, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 35(1), 37-43.