Skip Navigation Links
Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management
António Mendes Lopes (editor), Jiazhong Zhang(editor)
António Mendes Lopes (editor)

University of Porto, Portugal

Email: aml@fe.up.pt

Jiazhong Zhang (editor)

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province 710049, China

Fax: +86 29 82668723 Email: jzzhang@mail.xjtu.edu.cn


Emissions and Footprints: Resolving the Confusion Using National Accounts

Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management 14(3) (2026) 547--552 | DOI:10.5890/JEAM.2026.09.012

Thijs ten Raa

Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, the Netherlands

Download Full Text PDF

 

Abstract

I resolve the confusion surrounding emissions and footprints. Footprints impute industry emissions to end users (households). Product footprints are shown to be equal to emission intensities inflated by the Leontief inverse. However, unlike the prevailing practice of employing industry-by-industry dimensions, the input-output coefficients must have product-by-product dimensions and be constructed according to the product technology model. The analysis shows that an emission tax increases the product prices proportionally to the product footprints.

Acknowledgments

I gratefully acknowledge improvements suggested by an anonymous referee.

References

  1. [1]  Domar, E. (1961), On the measurement of technological change, Economic Journal, 71, 709-779.
  2. [2]  Leontief, W. (1966), Input-Output Economics; Oxford University Press: New York, USA.
  3. [3]  Leontief, W. (1970), Environmental repercussions and the economic structure---An input-output approach, Review of Economics and Statistics, 52(3), 262-270.
  4. [4]  ten Raa, T. and Stahlie, R. (2024), Footprint analysis and the incidence of emission taxes, Ecological Economics, 224, 108214.
  5. [5]  Mendes Platt, G., Kuczynski Nunes, V., Martins, P., Gonçalves de Faria Corrêa, R., and Souza Oliveira, F. (2024), The modelling of the evapotranspiration portion of the water footprint: A global sensitivity analysis in the Brazilian Serra Gaúcha, Earth, 5(2), 133-148.
  6. [6]  Stone, R. (1961), Input-Output and National Accounts, OECD: Paris, France.
  7. [7]  Beutel, J. (2017), The supply and use framework of national accounts, Handbook of Input-Output Analysis, Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, USA, 41-132.
  8. [8]  Kop Jansen, P. and ten Raa, T. (1990), The choice of model in the construction of input-output coefficients matrices, International Economic Review, 31(1), 213-227.
  9. [9]  OECD (2002), The OECD input--output database. Available online: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/43/2673344.pdf (accessed on 5 September 2023).
  10. [10]  ten Raa, T. and Stahlie, R. (2025), Footprint analysis and the incidence of emission taxes: Corrigendum, Ecological Economics, 229, 108472.
  11. [11]  Mattey, J. and ten Raa, T. (1997), Primary versus secondary production techniques in U.S. manufacturing, Review of Income and Wealth, 43(4), 449-464.
  12. [12]  Rueda-Cantuche, J. and Amores, A. (2010), Consistent and unbiased carbon dioxide emission multipliers: Performance of Danish emission reductions via external trade, Ecological Economics, 69(5), 988-998.
  13. [13]  Baumol, W. and Wolff, E. (1981) Subsidies to New Energy Sources: Do They Add to Energy Stocks?, Journal of Political Economics, 89(5), 891-913.
  14. [14]  Pigou, A. (1920), The Economics of Welfare, Macmillan: London, UK.
  15. [15]  ten Raa, T. and Shestalova, V. (2015), Supply-Use Framework for International Environmental Policy Analysis, Economic Systems Research, 27(1), 77-94.