---

Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management 12(4) (2024) 419--425 | DOI:10.5890/JEAM.2024.12.006

Daniela Muela, Fausto Viteri

Grupo de Protección Ambiental (GPA), Facultad de Ciencias de la Ingeniería e Industrias, Universidad UTE, Quito 170527, Ecuador

Download Full Text PDF

 

Abstract

In the present study, the quantification of criteria gas emissions was analysed according to the economic-environmental account of Ecuador from stationary sources during the period 2008-2017. The stationary sources considered were those involved in industrial, commercial, or service processes, as well as thermoelectric generation and oil refining. The criteria gases analysed were SO$_2$, NO$_X$, CO, NH$_3$, VOC, TOC, PM$_{10}$ and PM$_{2.5}$. The environmental economic account allows determining the reciprocal relationship of the environment (physical units) with the economy (monetary units), through stationary sources, as well as by economic sector (households, industries, and government). The different economic activities belonging to the different sectors were classified according to the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC). Emission factors (kg/m$^{3}$) approved by the environmental authority were used. In this way, results were obtained both in a disaggregated manner (by type of industry, type of pollutant and fuel used) as well as in an aggregated manner to obtain the total tons emitted by stationary sources. The criteria air pollutant, with the greatest contribution, from stationary sources was sulphur dioxide (SO$_2$), with a total of 1,088,462.35 tons emitted during the 2008-2017 period. Being the Industrial sector the main contributor to pollution, emitting 707,530.1 tons, specifically the economic activity related to Power Plants, its discharges represented 65 % of the total emissions of SO$_2$.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the technical team of the Department of Information, Monitoring and Evaluation of the Ministry of the Environment of Ecuador, for all the support provided to this research.

References

1. [1]	Guo, H., Sahu, S.K., Kota, S.H., and Zhang, H. (2019), Characterization and health risks of criteria air pollutants in Delhi, 2017, Chemosphere, 225, 27-34.

2. [2]	Herrera, J. (2014), Inventario de emisiones de contaminantes criterio de Costa Rica en 2011, Revista de Ciencias Ambientales, 48(2), 5-19.

3. [3]	Saxena, P. and Sonwani, S. (2019), Criteria air pollutants: chemistry, sources and sinks, In: Criteria Air Pollutants and their Impact on Environmental Health, 7-48.

4. [4]	Aneja, V.P., Agarwal, A., Roelle, P.A., Phillips, S.B., Tong, Q., Watkins, N., and Yablonsky, R. (2001), Measurements and analysis of criteria pollutants in New Delhi, India. Environment International, 27, 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00051-4.

5. [5]	Clarke, K., Kwon, H.O., and Choi, S.D. (2014), Fast and reliable source identification of criteria air pollutants in an industrial city, Atmospheric Environment, 95, 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.040.

6. [6]	Sbarato, D., Ortega, E., and Sbarato, V. (2009), Problemas Ambientales Generales. U.T.N Facultad Regional San Francisco, 1, 54.

7. [7]	Environmental Ministry. (2015), Cuenta de Emisiones al Aire Sistema de Contabilidad Ambiental 2008-2013, 1-31.

8. [8]	Espinoza, E.P. and Molina, C.E. (2014), Contaminación del aire exterior. Cuenca - Ecuador, 2009-2013. Posibles efectos en la salud, 32(2), 6-17.

9. [9]	Alvarez-Mendoza, C.I., Teodoro, A.C., Torres, N., Vivanco, V. (2019) Assessment of remote sensing data to model PM10 estimation in cities with a low number of air quality stations: A case of study in Quito, Ecuador, Environments, 6, 85.

10. [10]	Sorgato, V. (2016), Seis urbes en Ecuador se exceden en contaminación ambiental, según OMS. El Comercio. https://www.elcomercio.com/tendencias/ciudades-ecuador-polucion-enfermedades-contaminacion.htm

11. [11]	Valencia, V.H., Hertel O., Ketzel, M., and Levin, G. (2020), Modeling urban background air pollution in Quito, Ecuador. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 11, 646-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2019.12.014.

12. [12]	Bartelmus, P. (2014), Environmental--economic accounting: progress and digression in the SEEA revisions, Review of Income and Wealth, 60(4), 887-904.

13. [13]	Pirmana, V., Alisjahbana, A.S., Hoekstra, R., and Tukker, A. (2019), Implementation barriers for a system of environmental-economic accounting in developing countries and its implications for monitoring sustainable development goals, Sustainability, 11, 6417.

14. [14]	Vardon, M., Castaneda, J.P., Nagy, M., and Schanau, S. (2018), How the system of environmental-economic accounting can improve environmental information systems and data quality for decision making, Environmental Science and Policy, 89, 83-92.

15. [15]	Environmental Ministry. (2020), Ecuador es el tercer país en contar con un Sistema de Contabilidad Ambiental Nacional. https://www.ambiente.gob.ec/ecuador-es-el-tercer-pais-en-contar-con-un-sistema-de-contabilidad-ambiental-nacional/

16. [16]	UNSD-ISIC. (2022) United Nations Statistics Division. Economic Statistics.

17. [17]	Ministry of Energy and Non-Renewable Natural Resources. (2017), Balance Energético Nacional 2017, 1-176.

18. [18]	Government of the Federal District of Mexico. (2004), Inventario de Emisiones Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México 2004.

19. [19]	Palermo, F. (2014), Procesamiento de parámetros físicos e inventario de emisiones atmosféricas antropogénicas en la cuenca hidrográfica del río Napo. Universidad San Francisco de Quito. Ingeniería Ambiental. Quito.

20. [20]	Arellano, V. (2013), Determinación y análisis de las emisiones de contaminación primarias y rendimiento vehicular mediante la variación del octanaje y contenido de azufre en la gasolina y diésel. Master's thesis, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas.