[ Log In | Register]
! Skip Navigation Links
Skip Navigation Links
Image of Journal of Applied Nonlinear Dynamics
ISSN:2325-6192 (print)
ISSN:2325-6206 (online)
Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management
António Mendes Lopes (editor), Jiazhong Zhang(editor)
António Mendes Lopes (editor)

University of Porto, Portugal

Email: aml@fe.up.pt

Jiazhong Zhang (editor)

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province 710049, China

Fax: +86 29 82668723 Email: jzzhang@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

Demand Analysis on Forest-based Recreational Activities

Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management 10(3) (2022) 219--236 | DOI:10.5890/JEAM.2022.09.002

Paletto Alessandro$^1$, Fagarazzi Claudio$^2$, Grilli Gianluca$^{3,4}$, Lorenzini Leonardo$^2$, De Meo Isabella$^5$

$^{1}$ Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CREA), Research Centre Forestry and Wood, Trento (Italy)

$^{2}$ University of Florence, Dipartimento di Gestione dei Sistemi Agrari, Alimentari e Forestali (GESAAF), Italy

$^{3}$ The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Ireland

$^{4}$ Trinity college Dublin, Ireland

$^{5}$ Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CREA), Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Italy

Download Full Text PDF

 

Abstract

The nature-based recreational activities can be considered one of the most important cultural ecosystem services provided by forests. They provide benefits to local economy, human health and well-being reducing depression and mental illnesses risk and increasing social interactions. The aim of the present study is to assess the socio-economic importance of forest-based recreational activities using the travel cost demand analysis. The study was implemented in a black pine forest in Italy (Pratomagno forest) characterized by a multifunctional forest role and a diversified recreational attendance. The study on forest-based recreational activities was organized in four steps: development and pre-testing of a questionnaire; identification of the sample of visitors; administration of the questionnaire to the visitors; data processing. The results show that the most important forest-based recreational activity carried out by visitors is relaxing in the nature, followed by hiking and picnicking. The occasional visitors prefer more passive recreational activities (relaxing in the nature and picnicking), while regular and loyal visitors prefer more active recreational activities (hiking, mountain biking, picking non-wood forest products). A consumer surplus in the range between 39 and 44 \EUR\ per visit was estimated based on the model (Poisson and Negative binomial model), corresponding to 60.5-68.3~\EUR\ per hectare. The results show that nature-based recreational activities can generate positive direct and indirect benefits for forest managers and local people. The local decision makers should act on forest stand characteristics with the aim of increasing the recreational attractiveness and the consequent economic benefits.

References

  1. [1]  Atauri, J., Bravo, M., and Ruiz, A. (2000), Visitors' landscape preferences as a tool for management of recreational use in natural areas: A case study in Sierra de Guadarrama (Madrid, Spain), Landscape Research, 25, 49-62.
  2. [2]  Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., and M\"{u}ller, F. (2012), Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets, Ecological Indicators, 21, 17-29.
  3. [3]  Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K. (2005), Microeconometrics - Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  4. [4]  Cantiani, P. and Marchi, M. (2017), A spatial dataset of forest mensuration collected in black pine plantations in central Italy, Annals of Forest Science, 74, 50.
  5. [5]  Cantiani, P., Marchi, M., and Plutino M. (2017), SelPiBio LIFE per i popolamenti di pino nero. Una strategia selvicolturale per pinete artificiali con funzioni e destinazioni diverse, Sherwood, 225, 21-24.
  6. [6]  Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J., and Brown, T.C. (2003), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.
  7. [7]  Cordell, H.K. (2008), The latest on trends in nature-based outdoor recreation, Forest History Today, 2, 4-10.
  8. [8]  Cortinovis, C., Zulian, G., and Geneletti, D. (2018), Assessing Nature-Based Recreation to Support Urban Green Infrastructure Planning in Trento (Italy), Land, 7, 112.
  9. [9]  De Meo, I., Paletto, A., and Cantiani, M.G. (2015), The attractiveness of forests: Preferences and perceptions in a mountain community in Italy, Annals of Forest Research, 58, 145-156.
  10. [10]  Dorwart, C.E., Moore, R.L., and Leung, Y-F. (2010), Visitors' Perceptions of a Trail Environment and Effects on Experiences: A Model for Nature-Based Recreation Experiences, Leisure Sciences, 32, 33-54.
  11. [11]  Ebenberger, M. and Arnberger, A. (2019), Exploring visual preferences for structural attributes of urban forest stands for restoration and heat relief, Urban Forestry $\&$ Urban Greening, 41, 272-282.
  12. [12]  Englin, J. and Shonkwiler, J. (1995), Estimating Social Welfare Using Count Data Models: An Application to Long-Run Recreation Demand under Conditions of Endogenous Stratification and Truncation, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 104-12.
  13. [13]  Eriksson, L., Nordlund, A.M., Olsson, O., and Westin, K. (2012), Recreation in Different Forest Settings: A Scene Preference Study, Forests, 3, 923-943.
  14. [14]  Ezebilo, E.E. (2016), Economic value of a non-market ecosystem service: an application of the travel cost method to nature recreation in Sweden, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services $\&$ Management, 12, 314-327.
  15. [15]  Filyushkina, A., Agimass, F., Lundhede, T., Strange, N., and Jacobsen, J.B. (2017), Preferences for variation in forest characteristics: Does diversity between stands matter? Ecological Economics, 140, 22-29.
  16. [16]  Fredman, P., Boman, M., Lundmark, L., and Mattsson, L. (2012), Economic Values in the Swedish Nature-Based Recreation Sector -- A Synthesis, Tourism Economics, 18, 903-910.
  17. [17]  Garrod, G. and Willis, K. (1999), Economic Valuation of the Environment. Methods and Case Studies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
  18. [18]  Gios, G. and Notaro, S. (2001), La valutazione economica dei beni ambientali: introduzione al metodo della valutazione contingente, CEDAM, Padova.
  19. [19]  Goossen, M. and Langers, F. (2000), Assessing quality of rural areas in the Netherlands: Finding the most important indicators for recreation, Landscape and Urban Planning, 46, 241-251.
  20. [20]  G\"{o}ssling, S. and Hickler, T. (2017), Tourism and forest ecosystems. In: G\"{o}ssling, S., Hall, C.M. (eds.), Tourism and global environmental change: ecological, social, economic, and political interrelationships, Routledge, New York.
  21. [21]  Gray, P.A., Duwors, E., Villeneuve, M., Boyd, S., and Legg, D. (2003), The socioeconomic significance of nature-based recreation in Canada, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 86, 129-147.
  22. [22]  Grilli, G., Paletto, A., and De Meo, I. (2014), Economic Valuation of Forest Recreation in an Alpine valley, Baltic Forestry, 20, 167-175.
  23. [23]  Gundersen, V.S. and Frivold, L.H. (2008), Public preferences for forest structures: a review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden, Urban Forestry $\&$ Urban Greening, 7, 241-258.
  24. [24]  Haines-Yong, R. and Potschin, M. (2012), CICES Version 4: Response to Consultation. In Centre for Environmental Management; University of Nottingham: Nottingham.
  25. [25]  Hanley, N. and Barbier, E. (2009), Pricing Nature: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
  26. [26]  H\"{a}yh\"{a}, T. and Franzese, P.P. (2014), Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective, Ecological Modelling, 289, 124-132.
  27. [27]  H\"{a}yh\"{a}, T., Franzese, P.P., Paletto, A., and Faath, B.D. (2015), Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests, Ecosystem Services, 14, 12-23.
  28. [28]  Hilbe, J.M. and Mart{i}nez-Espi\~{n}eira, R. (2005), NBSTRAT: Stata Module to Estimate Negative Binomial with Endogenous Stratification. Boston College Department of Economics, Boston.
  29. [29]  Hynynen, J., Ahtikoski, A., Siitonen, J., Siev\"{a}nen, R., and Liski, J. (2005), Applying the MOTTI simulator to analyse the effects of alternative management schedules on timber and non-timber production, Forest Ecology and Management, 207, 5-18.
  30. [30]  IPBES (2019), Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services; IPBES Secretariat, Bonn.
  31. [31]  J\"{a}ckle, A., Lynn, P., Sinibaldi, J., and Tipping, S. (2011), The effect of interviewer personality, skills and attitudes on respondent co-operation with face-to-face surveys, Paper of the Institute for Social $\&$ Economic Research, Essex.
  32. [32]  Kaplan, R. and Kaplan, S. (1989), Experiencing nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  33. [33]  La Notte, A., Maes, J., Thieu, V., Bouraoui, F., and Masi, F. (2012), Biophysical Assessment and Monetary Valuation of Ecosystem Services. Scenario analysis for the case of water purification in Europe. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports, Joint Research Centre, Ispra.
  34. [34]  Langat, D.K., Maranga, E.K., Aboud, A.A., and Cheboiwo, J.K. (2018), The value of selected ecosystem services; a case study of East Mau Forest Ecosystem, Kenya, Journal of Forests, 5, 1-10.
  35. [35]  Larigauderie, A. and Mooney, H.A. (2010), The Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 9-14.
  36. [36]  Liu, J., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Tam, C., and Chen, X. (2008), Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services. PNAS, 105, 9777-9482.
  37. [37]  Louv, R. (1996), The web of life: Weaving the values that sustain us. Conari Press, Berkeley.
  38. [38]  Marchi, M., Paletto, A., Cantiani, P., Bianchetto, E., and De Meo, I. (2018), Comparing Thinning System Effects on Ecosystem Services Provision in Artificial Black Pine (Pinus nigra J. F. Arnold) Forests, Forests, 9, 188.
  39. [39]  Marcouiller, D.W. (1998), Environmental resources as latent primary factors of production in tourism: the case of forest-based commercial recreation, Tourism Economics,4, 131-145.
  40. [40]  Mart{i}nez-Espi\~{n}eira, R. and Hilbe, J. M. (2008), Effect on Recreation Benefit Estimates from Correcting for On-Site Sampling Biases and Heterogeneous Trip Overdispersion in Count Data Recreation Demand Models (STATA), 7(1).
  41. [41]  Mayo, E.J. and Jarvis, L.P. (1981), The psychology of leisure travel: effective marketing and selling of travel service. CBI Publishing, Boston.
  42. [42]  Mayor, K., Scott, S., and Tol, R.J.S. (2007), Comparing the travel cost method and the contingent valuation method - An application of convergent validity theory to the recreational value of Irish forests. Working Paper 190, The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin.
  43. [43]  MEA (2005), Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington.
  44. [44]  Nesbitt, L., Hotte, N., Barron, S., Cowan, J., and Sheppard, S.R.J. (2017), The social and economic value of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban forests in North America: A review and suggestions for future research, Urban Forestry $\&$ Urban Greening, 25, 103-111.
  45. [45]  Notaro, S. and Dallapiccola, C. (2000), Il valore paesaggistico-ricreativo di un'area alpina, Atti dell'Accademia Roveretana degli Agiati, 10, 153-169.
  46. [46]  Paletto, A., Guerrini, S., and De Meo, I. (2017), Exploring visitors' perceptions of silvicultural treatments to increase the destination attractiveness of peri-urban forests: A case study in Tuscany Region (Italy), Urban Forestry $\&$ Urban Greening, 27, 314-323.
  47. [47]  Pastorella, F., Avdagi{c}, A., \v{C}abaravdi{c}, A., Mrakovi{c}, A., Osmanovi{c}, M., and Paletto, A. (2016). Tourists' perception of deadwood in mountain forests, Annals of Forest Research, 59, 311-326.
  48. [48]  Pelyukh, O., Paletto, A., and Zahvoyska, L. (2019), Comparison between people's perceptions and preferences towards forest stand characteristics in Italy and Ukraine, Annals of Silvicultural Research, 43, 4-14.
  49. [49]  Raish, C., Wong, W., and Marziuff, J. (1997), Contemporary Human Use of Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forests. In: Block W.M., Finch, D.M., Songbird ecology in southwestern ponderosa pine forests: a literature review. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-292, USDA Forest Service: pp. 28-42.
  50. [50]  Ruddel, S., Sampson, R., Smith, M., Giffen, J., Hagan, J., Sosland, D., Godbee, J., Heissenbuttel, J., Lovett, S., Helms, J., Price, W., and Simpson, R. (2007), The role of sustainably managed forests in climate change mitigation, Journal of Forestry, 105, 314-319.
  51. [51]  Schaefer, M., Goldman, E., Bartuska, A.N., Sutton-Grier, A., and Lubchenco, J. (2015), Nature as capital: Advancing and incorporating ecosystem services in United States federal policies and programs, PNAS, 112, 7383-7389.
  52. [52]  Schleyer, C., G\"{o}rg, C., Hauck, J., and Winkel, K.J. (2015), Opportunities and challenges for mainstreaming the ecosystem services concept in the multi-level policy-making within the EU, Ecosystem Services, 16, 174-181.
  53. [53]  Shrestha, R.K., Stein, T.V., and Clark, J. (2007), Valuing nature-based recreation in public natural areas of the Apalachicola River region, Florida, Journal of Environmental Management, 85, 977-985.
  54. [54]  Simkin, J., Ojala, A., and Tyrv\"{a}inen, L. (2020), Restorative effects of mature and young commercial forests, pristine oldgrowth forest and urban recreation forest - A field experiment, Urban Forestry $\&$ Urban Greening, 48, 126567.
  55. [55]  Singer, E., Frankel, M.R., and Glassman, M.B. (1983), The effect of interviewer characteristics and expectations on response, Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 68-83.
  56. [56]  Smailes, P.J. and Smith, D.L. (2001), The growing recreational use of state forest lands in the Adelaide hills, Land Use Policy, 18, 137-152.
  57. [57]  St\"{u}rck, J., Poortinga, A., and Verburg, P.H. (2014), Mapping ecosystem services: the supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe, Ecological Indicators, 38, 198-211.
  58. [58]  TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundation. Earthscan, Cambridge.
  59. [59]  UK NEA (2011), The UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report; UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
  60. [60]  Viciani, D., Dell'Olmo, L., Gabellini, A., Gigante, D., and Lastrucci, L. (2018), Landscape dynamics of Mediterranean montane grasslands over 60 years and implications for habitats conservation. A case study in the northern Apennines (Italy), Landscape Research, 43, 952-964.
  61. [61]  Ward, F.A. and Beal, D. (2000), Valuing Nature with Travel Cost Models: A Manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
  62. [62]  Yoshimura, N. and Hiura, T. (2017), Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: Use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido, Ecosystem Services, 24, 68-78.
  63. [63]  Zandersen, M. and Tol, R.S.J. (2009), A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe, Journal of Forest Economics, 15, 109-130.

Copyright © 2011-2023 L & H Scientific Publishing. All rights reserved. Wildcard SSL Certificates