[ Log In | Register]
! Skip Navigation Links
Skip Navigation Links
Image of Journal of Applied Nonlinear Dynamics
ISSN:2325-6192 (print)
ISSN:2325-6206 (online)
Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management
António Mendes Lopes (editor), Jiazhong Zhang(editor)
António Mendes Lopes (editor)

University of Porto, Portugal

Email: aml@fe.up.pt

Jiazhong Zhang (editor)

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province 710049, China

Fax: +86 29 82668723 Email: jzzhang@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

Alternative Options for Sewage Sludge Treatment and Process Improvement Through Circular Patterns: LCA-based Case Study and Scenarios

Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management 3(1) (2015) 77--85 | DOI:10.5890/JEAM.2015.03.007

Salvatore Mellino$^{1}$, Gaetano Protano$^{1}$, Elvira Buonocore$^{1}$, Giuseppe De Angelis$^{2}$, Gengyuan Liu$^{2}$, Linyu Xu$^{2}$, Sergio Ulgiati$^{1}$,$^{2}$

$^{1}$ Department of Sciences and Technologies, Parthenope University of Naples, Centro DirezionaledIsola C4, 80143 Naples, Italy

$^{2}$ State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Download Full Text PDF

 

Abstract

In the pursuit of more sustainable wastewater treatment (WWT) processes, life cycle assessment (LCA) can be used as a valuable tool to evaluate the environmental impacts associated to WWT plants. In this study LCA is applied to compare the environmental performance of three scenarios for sludge disposal in a WWT plant located in southern Italy. The first business-as-usual scenario is based on the actual sludge management performed within the case-study plant: after mechanical treatment, dewatered sludge is transported by truck to a landfill for final disposal. The second scenario assumes a circular pattern, with anaerobic fermentation of sludge to biogas, and biogas use for electricity and heat cogeneration: electricity is feedback to WWT, while heat is used for digestate drying, in addition to thermal energy from previously recovered waste cooking oil (WCO). The third scenario suggests an improved circular pat-tern where the dried sludge is further gasified for syngas production and syngas is added to biogas for heat and electricity production. Scenario results suggest that increased circularity through recycling would be capable of reducing both the contribution to environmental impact categories and the fossil energy consumption up to 50%.

Acknowledgments

Sergio Ulgiati, Linyu Xu, Gengyuan Liu and Giuseppe De Angelis gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Science & Technology Pillar Program, China (No. 2012BAC05B02). Sergio Ulgiati also acknowledges the contract by the School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, within the framework of the National “One Thousand Foreign Experts Plan”, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

References

  1. [1]  Alhassan F. H., Rashid U. and Taufiq-Yap Y.H. (2015), Synthesis of waste cooking oil-based biodiesel via effectual recyclable bifunctional Fe2O3AMnOASO42_/ZrO2 nanoparticle solid catalyst, Fuel 142: 38-45.
  2. [2]  Buonocore, E., Franzese, P.P. and Ulgiati, S. (2012), Assessing the environmental performance and sustainability of bioenergy production in Sweden: A life cycle assessment perspective, Energy 37: 69-78.
  3. [3]  Cao, Y. and Pawłowski, A. (2013), Life cycle assessment of two emerging sewage sludge-to-energy systems: evaluating energy and green-house gas emissions implications, Bioresource Technology 127: 81-91.
  4. [4]  Cherubini, F., Bargigli, S. and Ulgiati, S. (2009), Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration, Energy 34: 2116-2123.
  5. [5]  Corominas, L., Foley, J., Guest, J.S., Hospido A., Larsen, H.F., Morera S. and Shaw A. (2013), Life cycle assessment applied to wastewater treatment: State of the art, Water Research 47: 5480-5492.
  6. [6]  Frischknecht, R. and Jungbluth, N. (eds) (2003), Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. Final report ecoinvent 2000, Swiss Centre for LCI. Dübendorf, CH.
  7. [7]  Guest, J.S., Skerlos, S.J., Barnard, J.L., Beck, M.B., Daigger, G.T., Hilger, H., Jackson, S.J., Karvazy, K., Kelly, L., Macpherson, L., Mihelcic, J.R., Pramanik, A., Raskin, L., Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Yeh, D. and Love, N.G. (2009), A new planning and design par-adigm to achieve sustainable resource recovery from wastewater, Environmental Science and Technology 43(16): 6121-6125.
  8. [8]  Hong, J., Hong, J., Otaki, M. and Jolliet, O. (2009), Environmental and economic life cycle assessment for sewage sludge treatment processes in Japan, Waste Management 29(2): 696-703.
  9. [9]  Hospido, A., Moreira, M.T., Martin, M., Rigola, M. and Feijoo, G. (2005), Environmental evaluation of different treatment processes for sludge from urban wastewater Treatments: anaerobic digestion versus thermal processes, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(5): 336-345.
  10. [10]  ILCD, International Reference Life Cycle Data System, Handbook (2010a), General guidance for life cycle assessment. Detailed guidance. Joint Research Centre, European Commission, EC-JRC.
  11. [11]  ILCD, International Reference Life Cycle Data System, Handbook (2010b), General guidance for life cycle assessment. Previsions and action steps. Joint Research Centre, European Commission, EC-JRC.
  12. [12]  ISO 14040, International Standard (2006), Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, www.iso.org.
  13. [13]  ISO 14044, International Standard (2006), Environmental management-lifecycle assessment-requirements and guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, www.iso.org.
  14. [14]  Liu, G.Y., Yang, Z.F., Chen, B., Zhang, J.R., Liu, X.Y., Zhang, Y., Su, M.R. and Ulgiati, S. (2014), Scenarios for sewage sludge reduction and reuse in clinker production towards regional eco-industrial development: a comparative emergy-based assessment, Journal of Cleaner Production doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.003.
  15. [15]  Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg., T., Schmidt, W.P., Suh, S., Weidema, B.P. and Pennington, D.W. (2004), Life cycle assessment Part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications, Environment International 7: 1-20.
  16. [16]  Ripa, M., Buonaurio, C., Mellino, S., Fiorentino, G. and Ulgiati, S. (2014), Recycling Waste Cooking Oil into Biodiesel: A Life Cycle Assessment, International Journal of Performability Engineering 10(4): 347-356.
  17. [17]  Wegener Sleeswijk, A., Van Oers, L.F.C.M., Guinée, J.B., Struijs, J. and Huijbregts, M.A.J. (2008), Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: An LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000, Science of the Total Environment 390(1): 227-240.
  18. [18]  WRF, Water Research Foundation (2013), Toolbox for Water Utility Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emission Management. http://www.waterrf.org/PublicReportLibrary/4224.pdf.
  19. [19]  Yaakob, Z., Mohammad, M., Alherbawi, M., Alam, Z. and Sopian, K. (2013), Overview of the production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 18: 184-193.

Copyright © 2011-2023 L & H Scientific Publishing. All rights reserved. Wildcard SSL Certificates